Although I really appreciated Mellody Hobson’s TED Talk, this blog post focuses on my reflections on Colorblindness Is the New Racism. In the reading, the authors argue that racial inequality is maintained not only through individual prejudice, but through systemic white privilege that gives unearned advantages to white people. They explain that this privilege often goes unnoticed and is reinforced by colorblind thinking (the belief that ignoring race promotes equality). However, by refusing to acknowledge race, colorblindness ignores very real disparities in wealth, education, representation, and opportunity. The authors ultimately argue that meaningful change requires recognizing these hidden advantages and challenging the structures that maintain inequality.
This reading immediately made me think of people who say they “don’t see color.” In my experience, that statement often comes from someone who either wants to avoid a conversation about race or wants to clarify that they are not personally racist. While it may be well-intentioned, it suggests that race and the lived realities attached to it, do not matter. When someone claims not to see color, it can dismiss the ongoing effects of racism and systemic inequality. Ignoring race does not eliminate inequity, it simply makes it harder to address. So long story short, saying that you don't see color actually has the opposite effect of what some people intend it to be.
This expectation creates an unfair burden, often described as cultural taxation. This is a term used to refer to the extra responsibilities (emotional and intellectual labor) placed on individuals from underrepresented groups simply because of their identity. Faculty and students of color may be expected to educate others about racism, or speak up during racial tensions. There is an unspoken pressure that if we do not step in, no one else will. This emotional and intellectual labor is rarely acknowledged, yet it can be exhausting and take time away from other academic or professional responsibilities. Even though this is a term mostly used within the academia world, this is very much true in other professions. I think this term can even be applied to small everyday scenarios such as, always relying on the one POC at your job to be the spokesperson about diversity, or even to speak about their experiences with microaggressions.
Lastly, I really liked the section titled Examining Systems of Privilege: The Power Line Exercise. It highlights that society is not neutral, rather some groups are positioned closer to power and privilege, while others are positioned further away due to structural factors. This exercise encouraged me to reflect on my own position in regards to the power line. I am non-White, an immigrant, and a woman, which can place me at certain disadvantages within dominant systems. At the same time, I attend an institution of higher education, I am able-bodied, and I identify as Christian, these are identities that grant me forms of privilege. Privilege and marginalization can coexist within the same person. I think that recognizing these layered identities are important to understanding how systems of power operate and how to dismantle them.
I really appreciate your point about conversations on race becoming "special interest" rather than general concern. I often see those conversations shifted to small committees or groups of people in the institution. What are your thoughts on using identity groups to support this function? On one side, they deserve to be given the type of access and input, but on the other you don't want to just say someone is an expert because of their identify, or forcing them to do extra work just because they've joined a group.
ReplyDeleteHi Susana, I appreciate how you explained cultural taxation and how it is found both in academia and everyday life. The emotional and intellectual burden on individuals is not recognized. This topic reminds me of when non-English speaking children are sent down to the nurse’s office with another student to translate for them. While the non-English speaking student is more comfortable with someone translating their needs, I am often concerned for the student that is translating. In the hospital setting this is unacceptable. Legally we are required to provide the proper translation services. I think this is huge responsibility for young children and is clearly overlooked.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for bringing the "cultural taxation" piece into our discussion in class this week. "This resonated because people of color are typically the ones who most directly experience racism and exclusion, and as a result, they are often treated as “experts” on these issues." If nothing else, I do hope that a class like this helps those with more privilege learn how to find a voice around issue of privilege to lower the costs of taxation for those who are often burdened with it! Thanks for sharing this.
ReplyDelete